Tomas v. Arizona, State of
| Michele Tomas |
| Arizona, State of and Arizona Department of Administration |
| 2:2021cv01153 |
| July 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint. Defendant shall have and extension of time, up to and including September 7, 2021 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 8/23/21. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER - Granting #10 Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Defendant. Attorney John Michael Fry is removed from receiving electronic court notices in this matter and substitute attorneys C. Christine Burns and Alexandra E. Miller. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 8/23/21. (SMH)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burns, Catherine) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Christine Burns on behalf of Arizona, State of. (Burns, Catherine) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Defendant, MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Defendant)(Fry, John) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint. Defendant shall have an extension of time until August 24, 2021, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/27/21. (MAW)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint (First Request) by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fry, John) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michele Tomas: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial, Consent to Magistrate Form and Order upon State of Arizona, Department of Administration on July 13, 2021. (Schleier, Tod) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER this case be reassigned, by lot, to another Judge in the District of Arizona. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter has been reassigned by random lot to the Honorable Susan R. Bolton. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-21-01153-PHX-SRB. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 7/08/2021. (ESG)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arizona, State of. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19627863. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-1153-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Michele Tomas. (Schleier, Tod) (ARC) |
| Filing 2 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Michele Tomas. (Schleier, Tod) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19627863 filed by Michele Tomas. (Schleier, Tod) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
