Phillips v. Allen et al
Shantae Marie Phillips |
Candra Allen, Tiana Allen, Davisha Carter, Mary Cook, Kevyn Davis, Latanya Edmonson, Selena Flewellen, Sonora Gillie, Isaac Jackson, Reeva Joann Jefferson, Belinda Jones, James Lewis, Anisha Logan, Kantaniesha Mckinney, Cemetra Mitchell, Sharnell Mitchell, Tamarcus Mitchell, Mark Morgan, Sarah Neal, Lawrence Nichols, Vernisha Perkins, Kiauna Taylor, Santreesa Taylor, Tarina Taylor, Tranesha Woods, Larry West and Alecia Taylor |
2:2021cv01160 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Deborah M Fine |
G Murray Snow |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Shantae Marie Phillips (5 pages). (SJF) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or file a full and complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by August 25, 2021, the Clerk of Court must enter judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot on or after August 26, 2021. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 8/09/2021. (REK) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge G Murray Snow. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-21-1160-PHX-GMS. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 8 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Shantae Marie Phillips shall show cause in writing on or before August 25, 2021, why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned or be held in contempt of court pursuant to title 18 U.S.C. 401 for failing to comply Rule 3.7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plaintiff complies with Rule 3.7(b) on or before August 25, 2021, by either consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction or electing to have the case assigned to a District Judge, the undersigned will automatically vacate this Order to Show Cause. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 8/6/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DXD) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: 2:21-cv-1160. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(DXD) |
Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Shantae Marie Phillips. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (DXD) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Shantae Marie Phillips. (DXD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shantae Marie Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.