Burgess v. Shinn et al
Petitioner: Steven Burgess
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2021cv01164
Filed: July 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: John Z Boyle
2 Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 Filing 6 Limited RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) Index of Exhibits A-W by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-W)(Cain, Amy)
July 28, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Pignatella Cain on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Cain, Amy)
July 27, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 07/26/21. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/26/21. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition) (SST)
July 6, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST)
July 6, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Steven Burgess. Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX230027. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (28 pages) Modified to add receipt information on 7/8/2021 (SST).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgess v. Shinn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Represented By: Amy Pignatella Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Amy Pignatella Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?