Vargas-Wernick v. Nationwide General Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Danielle M Vargas-Wernick and Richard H Wernick
Defendant: Nationwide General Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2021cv01197
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting the parties' Stipulation #7 and staying this litigation for a period of time commencing on the date of this Order and ending on December 23, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Defendant's Motion to Compel Appraisal and for Stay #5 . Defendant shall file its responsive pleading no later than January 6, 2022 to Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. #1 -3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status report to apprise the Court of remaining issues in contest no later than January 6, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 7/29/2021. (REK)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED if Defendant files a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c) and if Plaintiffs contend any further amendment of their Complaint (Doc. 1-3) can cure any alleged deficiency, Plaintiffs must submit, no later than the time they file a response to a motion to dismiss, a proposed amended complaint containing all further allegations Plaintiffs could make. FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event a motion to dismiss is granted in any part, no leave will be granted to amend the Complaint beyond what is offered in that proposed amended complaint. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 7/29/2021. (KFZ)
July 28, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION for Temporary Stay of Proceedings by Nationwide General Insurance Company. (Sharlot, Laurence)
July 16, 2021 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Lars Skulborstad in Support of Motion to Compel Appraisal and for Stay by Defendant Nationwide General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sharlot, Laurence)
July 16, 2021 Filing 5 *MOTION to Compel Appraisal and for Stay by Nationwide General Insurance Company. (Sharlot, Laurence). *Added MOTION to Stay on 7/19/2021 (KAH).
July 12, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nationwide General Insurance Company. (Sharlot, Laurence)
July 9, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Nationwide General Insurance Company. (DLC)
July 9, 2021 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19651268. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-1197-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-009199. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19651268 filed by Nationwide General Insurance Company. (Sharlot, Laurence) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Coversheet, #3 Exhibit)(DLC)
July 9, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Notice of Service (certified mail) re: Summons/Complaint upon Nationwide General Insurance Company on 6/15/2021. (Original filed in Maricopa Superior Court on 6/15/2021). (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vargas-Wernick v. Nationwide General Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle M Vargas-Wernick
Represented By: Robert David Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard H Wernick
Represented By: Robert David Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide General Insurance Company
Represented By: Joseph Andrew Brophy
Represented By: Laurence Randall Sharlot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?