Williams v. McBride
| Jamaar Williams |
| Douglas McBride |
| 2:2021cv01210 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Eileen S Willett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis Brent Hill on behalf of Douglas McBride. (Hill, Travis) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Douglas McBride: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 08/13/2021 to Sgt. Douglas McBride . (Hill, Travis) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve the Defendant or seek a waiver of service for the Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on the Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/16/2021. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 *Additional Attachment to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Jamaar Williams. (Benedetto, Stephen) *Modified to correct event and text on 7/13/2021 (REK). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Jamaar Williams. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please re-file the Civil Cover Sheet, using the correct format. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 0970-19655880 filed by Jamaar Williams. (Benedetto, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. McBride | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamaar Williams | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Dominic Benedetto |
| Represented By: | William Henry Knight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Douglas McBride | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J O'Connor |
| Represented By: | Travis Brent Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
