Rodriguez v. Valor Global LLC
Raymond Rodriguez |
Valor Global LLC |
2:2021cv01256 |
July 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant (s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on October 19, 2021, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/21/21. (MAW) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Valor Global LLC. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Zackary S Kaylor, Jacob R Rusch on behalf of Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Traulsen, Richard) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Raymond Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Traulsen, Richard) |
Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19681867. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-01256-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez.(Traulsen, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(REM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19681867 filed by Raymond Rodriguez.(Traulsen, Richard) (REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Valor Global LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raymond Rodriguez | |
Represented By: | Jacob R Rusch |
Represented By: | Richard Phillip Traulsen |
Represented By: | Zackary S Kaylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Valor Global LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.