Lee v. North American Recovery
Michael A Lee, Jr. |
North American Recovery |
2:2021cv01342 |
August 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
G Murray Snow |
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Stipulated Motion to Extend. Defendant shall have an extension to 10/25/2021 in which to file its answer or responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . The deadline shall not be further extended absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/1/2021. (KFZ) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time To Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (First Request) by North American Recovery. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Monroe, Robert) Modified on 10/1/2021 (KFZ). |
Filing 8 NOTICE re: of Service by Michael A Lee, Jr re: #6 Order . (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michael A Lee, Jr: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 8/5/2021 to Ronald F. Price . (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 6 ORDER - Motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant and file notice of service. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 8/3/21. (DXD) |
Filing 5 ORDER - The Clerk shall terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on 11/2/2021. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 8/3/21. (DXD) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to North American Recovery. (REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19727183. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-01342-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael A Lee, Jr. (Coleman, Eric) (REM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19727183 filed by Michael A Lee, Jr. (Coleman, Eric) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Eric D Coleman on behalf of Plaintiff Michael A Lee, Jr. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lee v. North American Recovery | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael A Lee, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Eric D Coleman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: North American Recovery | |
Represented By: | Robert Rory Monroe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.