Greco v. Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated et al
Joseph J Greco and Sharlotte Lee Croxford |
Karen Canton, Unknown Canton and Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated |
2:2021cv01560 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan M Brnovich |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated, Karen Canton. (Hedberg, Kelly) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Joseph J Greco. (Clark, Jason) |
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 4/29/2022. Dispositive motions due by 9/9/2022. IT IS ORDERED the 10/29/2021 Rule 16 Case Management Conference is vacated. On 9/23/2022 at 9:00 a.m. (15 minutes allowed), the court will conduct a telephonic trial setting conference. Participants shall have their calendars available for the conference. The parties will receive dial-in instructions for connecting to the teleconference via electronic mail prior to the hearing. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 10/22/2021. (ESG) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Joseph J Greco. (Clark, Jason) |
Filing 11 Defendants' ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated, Karen Canton.(Hedberg, Kelly) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Gavin Purcell Lentz, Albert Michael Belmont, III on behalf of Plaintiff Joseph J Greco. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Joseph J Greco. (Klain, William) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Joseph J Greco . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Klain, William) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second Amended Complaint) against Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated, Karen Canton, Unknown Canton filed by Joseph J Greco.(Klain, William) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. for Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated. (Hedberg, Kelly) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for October 29, 2021 at 8:45 a.m. (15 minutes allowed). The parties will receive dial-in instructions for connecting to the teleconference via electronic mail prior to the hearing. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/15/2021. (ESG) |
Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/15/2021. (ESG) |
Filing 4 ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/15/2021. (ESG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated. (SCA) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19858682. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-01560-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-012109. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19858682 filed by Arthur J Gallagher & Company Insurance Brokers of California Incorporated, Karen Canton. (Hedberg, Kelly) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(SCA) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Declaration of Service re: Summons, First Amended Complaint, Certification as to Necessity of Expert Opinion Testimony, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Karen Canton-Daughter of John Doe Canton on 08/13/2021.(Original Filed in Maricopa County on 08/19/2021). SERVICE EXECUTED : Declaration of Service re: Summons, First Amended Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Arthur J. Gallagher & Co Insurance Brokers Of California c/o Department of Insurance on 08/12/2021.(Original Filed in Maricopa County on 08/19/2021). (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.