Peterson v. Penske Truck Leasing Company LP et al
Plaintiff: Eugene W Peterson
Defendant: Penske Truck Leasing Company LP, John Marvin and Eric Ingram
Case Number: 2:2021cv01628
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff having failed to respond to the Minute Order (Doc. #4 ), this civil case is terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NKS)
September 23, 2021 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: When bringing an action, a plaintiff must either pay a filing fee of $350, plus an administrative fee of $52, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees. Any application to proceed in forma pauperis must include a statement of all assets a plaintiff possesses to show that the person is unable to pay such fees. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee for this action nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of this deficiency, the Court will give Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff fails to submit the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (SST)
September 23, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST)
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-01628-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SST)
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Eugene W Peterson. (SST) (12 pages)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Penske Truck Leasing Company LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene W Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penske Truck Leasing Company LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Marvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Ingram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?