Martin et al v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Plaintiff: Richard Martin and Nancy Martin
Defendant: Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv01666
Filed: September 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
November 4, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Nancy Martin, Richard Martin. (Wise, Brandon)
October 8, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Brandon M Wise, Adam Florek on behalf of Plaintiffs Nancy Martin, Richard Martin. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 9/28/21. (MJF)
September 28, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
September 28, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19910842. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-1666-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
September 28, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Nancy Martin, Richard Martin. (Siri, Aaron) (DLC)
September 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19910842 filed by Richard Martin, Nancy Martin. (Siri, Aaron) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin et al v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Martin
Represented By: Aaron Siri
Represented By: Adam Florek
Represented By: Brandon M Wise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Martin
Represented By: Aaron Siri
Represented By: Adam Florek
Represented By: Brandon M Wise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?