Todd v. Yuma, County of et al
Barry Todd |
Yuma, County of, James Eustace and Unknown Parties |
2:2021cv01689 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Diane J Humetewa |
James F Metcalf |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER - The parties must complete their Rule 26(f) planning conference on or before December 13, 2021. Plaintiff is responsible for scheduling and initiating the conference between the parties. Discovery due by 5/24/2022. Dispositive motions due by 7/26/2022. Pretrial Motions due by 8/23/2022. This matter is set for a telephonic preliminary scheduling conference on January 12, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable James F. Metcalf. See document for complete deadlines and details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 11/24/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 13 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by James Eustace, Yuma, County of. (Molinario, Michele) |
Filing 12 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by James Eustace, Yuma, County of.(Molinario, Michele) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Stipulation For Extension of Time. Defendants have through November 19, 2021 to respond to the Complaint. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 11/16/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by James Eustace, Yuma, County of. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Graffious, Derek) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek Ryan Graffious on behalf of James Eustace, Yuma, County of. (Graffious, Derek) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Barry Todd: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Standing Order upon James Eustace on October 22, 2021. (Cowan, Barbara) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Barry Todd: Proof of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Standing Order upon County of Yuma on October 20, 2021. (Cowan, Barbara) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to James Eustace, Yuma, County of. (DXD). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 5 ORDER - Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses (Doc. #3 ). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 10/15/21. (DXD) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Barry Todd. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Barry Todd. (Cowan, Barbara) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JAM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19927958 filed by Barry Todd. (Cowan, Barbara) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.