Gajera et al v. CL Maack Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Nilesh Gajera and Sharad Gajera
Defendant: CL Maack Incorporated an Arizona Corporation doing business as Ponderosa Market, Cinthyan Lee Maack and Hardscrabble Investments Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2021cv01745
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Stay by Nilesh Gajera, Sharad Gajera. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brower, Stephen)
November 22, 2021 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CL Maack Incorporated, Hardscrabble Investments Incorporated, Cinthyan Lee Maack. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19966348. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-1745-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Nilesh Gajera, Sharad Gajera. (Brower, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ARC)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19966348 filed by Nilesh Gajera, Sharad Gajera. (Brower, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gajera et al v. CL Maack Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nilesh Gajera
Represented By: Stephen Brower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharad Gajera
Represented By: Stephen Brower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CL Maack Incorporated an Arizona Corporation doing business as Ponderosa Market
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cinthyan Lee Maack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hardscrabble Investments Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?