Adamcik v. Unanet Incorporated
| Maureen Adamcik |
| Unanet Incorporated |
| 2:2021cv01839 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER issued: Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T Liburdi. The parties must jointly file the Joint Proposed Case Management Report with the Clerk of the Court at least 10 days before the Scheduling Conference. See Order for additional details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 11/30/21. Please Note: Courtroom locations are subject to change. Please check the calendar display in the courthouse upon your arrival for confirmation of courtroom location.(SJF)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Unanet Incorporated. (Bujanda Rosell, Y) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Unanet Incorporated.(Bujanda Rosell, Y) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the First Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #5 ). The deadline for Defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is extended to 12/3/2021. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 11/29/2021. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (RMW)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Unanet Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bujanda Rosell, Y) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Unanet Incorporated. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20027080. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-01839-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Maureen Adamcik. (Kresin, David) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20027080 filed by Maureen Adamcik. (Kresin, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adamcik v. Unanet Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maureen Adamcik | |
| Represented By: | David Charles Kresin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unanet Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Rachel Yee |
| Represented By: | John F Lomax, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Y Rubi Bujanda Rosell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
