Payne v. Penzone et al
| Lamont Payne |
| Paul Penzone, Unknown Gibbs and Unknown Gardea |
| 2:2021cv01953 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed November 23, 2021, judgment of dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Plaintiff.s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he must prepay the entire $402.00 filing and administrative fees when he files his action. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/23/21. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMH) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lamont Payne. (SMH) (1 page) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lamont Payne. (SMH) (3 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Lamont Payne. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SMH) (8 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
