United States of America v. Cottonwood Lane LLC
United States of America |
Cottonwood Lane LLC |
2:2021cv02069 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Cottonwood Lane LLC. (LFIG) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cottonwood Lane LLC.(DXD) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by United States of America: Proof of Service re: Waiver of Service of Summons upon Cottonwood Lane, L.L.C. on 12/30/2021. (Creta, Vincent) |
Filing 7 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 3/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 12/27/2021. (See Order for details.) (LFIG) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re: Service on Defendant by United States of America re: #5 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions . (Creta, Vincent) |
Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 12/7/2021. (LFIG) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cottonwood Lane LLC. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J. Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-02069-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by United States of America. (Creta, Vincent) (SCA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by United States of America. (Creta, Vincent) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Cottonwood Lane LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Vincent Michael Creta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cottonwood Lane LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.