Fox v. Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated
| Ashley Fox |
| Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated |
| 2:2021cv02099 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Dana Lauren Hooper. (Hooper, Dana) |
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the parties' #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and including 2/14/2022. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/18/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hooper, Dana) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ashley Fox: Proof of Service re: Complaint upon Oregano's Pizza Bistro Inc on 12/23/2021. (Lowery, Courtney) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/13/2021. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20145808. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-02099-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ashley Fox. (Lowery, Courtney) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20145808 filed by Ashley Fox. (Lowery, Courtney) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fox v. Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashley Fox | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Lowery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oregano's Pizza Bistro Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Dana Lauren Hooper |
| Represented By: | Robert M Goldich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
