Burkel v. Haavig et al
| Thomas L Burkel |
| Monica Haavig and Paul Haavig |
| 2:2021cv02145 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is denied. Plaintiff has 30 days from the filing date of this Order to pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee. If Plaintiff fails to pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 1/06/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas L Burkel. (5 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Thomas L Burkel. (5 pages)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
