Oatman v. Montgomery et al
Plaintiff: Andre L Oatman
Defendant: William G Montgomery, Jeremy D Miller, Jerry Bernstein and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2021cv02178
Filed: December 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett (PS)
Referring Judge: Diane J Humetewa
2 Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #8 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. #7 ) is denied. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Procedure and LRCiv. 3.4. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/8/22. (SST)
February 3, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE re: First Request for Production of Documents by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (21 pages)
February 3, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE re: First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (19 pages)
February 3, 2022 Filing 10 AFFIDAVITS by Plaintiff Andre L Oatman. (SST) (22 pages)
February 3, 2022 Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (4 pages)
February 3, 2022 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (2 pages)
February 3, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (8 pages)
January 21, 2022 Filing 6 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number PHX234748. PAID IN FULL. (BAS)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/07/2022. (REK)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that this matter has been reassigned by the Clerk of Court, by random lot, to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-21-02178-PHX-DLR(ESW). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 1/03/2022. (REK)
December 20, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST)
December 20, 2021 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Andre L Oatman. (SST) (3 pages)
December 20, 2021 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Andre L Oatman. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17, #17 Part 18, #18 Part 19, #19 Part 20) (SST) (915 pages) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2021: #20 Envelope) (SST).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oatman v. Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre L Oatman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William G Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy D Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?