Taylor, III v. Bradley-Green, et al
| Charles Michael Taylor, III |
| Monica Yvette Bradley-Green, Marcus L Griffin, B Presslar and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2021cv02223 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to pay filing fee for Notice of Appeal, or MOTION for Extension of Time to pursue Appeal upon his release when he can afford the filing fee filed by Charles Michael Taylor, III. (SMH) (1 page). |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed February 9, 2022, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed for failure to state a claim. This dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). (SMH) |
Filing 9
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (2) The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (3) The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a) (3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 2/9/22. (SMH)
|
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number PHX234947. PAID IN FULL. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (SMH) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. (2) Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. (3) If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (4) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 1/24/22. (Attachments: #1 IFP Instructions and form) (SJF)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Charles Michael Taylor, III: #349853, FLORENCE-AZ-EYMAN-ASPC-COOK, P.O. BOX 3200, FLORENCE, AZ 85132. (SMH) |
| Filing 4 *DUPLICATE of Doc. #3 * NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMH) *Modified on 12/30/2021. (SMH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. (SMH) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Charles Michael Taylor, III. (SMH) (4 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Charles Michael Taylor, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SMH) (15 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
