Connor v. Arizona State University et al
Plaintiff: Courtney Connor
Defendant: Arizona State University and Arizona Board of Regents
Case Number: 2:2022cv00006
Filed: January 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a notice within 7 days of any Defendant answering (or, in a removed case, within 7 days of removal if any Defendant answered prior to removal) that the parties are ready for a Rule 16 scheduling conference. The Court will issue an order setting a Rule 16 conference. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/4/2022. (WLP)
January 4, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Courtney Connor. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC)
January 4, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
January 4, 2022 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Robert Christopher Ekstrand on behalf of Plaintiff Courtney Connor. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
January 3, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20209186. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-6-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
January 3, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Courtney Connor. (Ekstrand, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ARC)
January 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20209186 filed by Courtney Connor. (Ekstrand, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Connor v. Arizona State University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Connor
Represented By: Robert Christopher Ekstrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona State University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?