Seneca #113423 v. Koeppel et al
| Kristofer Michael Seneca |
| Cynthia M Koeppel, Quinn Harvey, Alfred Ramos, Kimberly Byed, James Kimble, Unknown Hernandez, Diego Plancarte, N Carreon, Donald Ford, Unknown Brown, Christopher Rush, Catherine Moore, Unknown Smith, Janah Barreras, M Stephan, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Amy Mueller |
| 2:2022cv00109 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number PHX236035. PAID IN FULL. (BAS) |
| Filing 13 LODGED Proposed First Amended Complaint re: #12 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for New or Amended Complaint. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Kristofer Michael Seneca. (35 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for New or Amended Complaint and Request to Apply Previous Motion to Exceed the Page Limitation by Kristofer Michael Seneca. (3 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Compliance by Kristofer Michael Seneca re: #9 Order. (2 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Direct Defendants to Disclose Full Names of Certain Defendants and to File Under Seal the Last Known Address of Certain Defendants by Kristofer Michael Seneca. (2 Pages) (REK) |
Filing 9
ORDER - (1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is denied without prejudice. (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Direct ADCRR to Remit Filing Fee (Doc. #8 ) is denied without prejudice. (3) Within 60 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. (4) If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 60 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court- approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non- Habeas) and a copy of the 2/9/22 letter from the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R. Bolton on 2/22/22. (NKS)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Direct ADCRR to Remit Filing Fee by Kristofer Michael Seneca (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Errata re: #3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Kristofer Michael Seneca. (LAD) (1 page) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court of Potential Procedural Issue by Kristofer Michael Seneca. (LAD) (3 pages) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (DXD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kristofer Michael Seneca (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 2 LODGED Proposed Complaint re: #1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Complaint. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Kristofer Michael Seneca (35 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Complaint by Kristofer Michael Seneca (7 pages). (DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
