Cohen v. Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC et al
Ariel Cohen |
Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC, Patrick Nichols and Unknown Parties |
2:2022cv00138 |
January 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Michael T Liburdi |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER: Before the Court is the parties' Stipulated Motion Regarding Acceptance of Service and an Extension for Defendants to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #19 ). For good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. #19 ) is granted. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than April 15, 2022. ORDERED by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/18/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LFIG) |
Filing 19 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Submitted (Stipulated Motion Regarding Acceptance of Service and An Extension for Defendants to Respond To Complaint) by Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC, Patrick Nichols. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Esber, Amelia) |
Filing 18 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 5/16/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/24/2022. (See Order for details.) (LFIG) |
Filing 17 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/24/2022. (LFIG) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Diane J Humetewa. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-136-PHX-DJH. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 15 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC. (Goldich, Robert) |
Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #10 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Envision Physician Services of Arizona shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than March 21, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 2/16/22. (SST) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Amelia Anne Esber on behalf of Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC. (Esber, Amelia) |
Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Complaint) by Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Goldich, Robert) |
Filing 9 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ariel Cohen: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Summons upon Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC on 1/27/22. (Finson, Lowell) *Modified to correct service date on 2/11/2022 (SST). |
Filing 8 ORDER OF RECUSAL - That this matter is reassigned by random draw to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-22-138-PHX-DMF. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 2/8/22. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Magistrate Election Form Deadline. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M Goldich on behalf of Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC. (Goldich, Robert) |
Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on April 26, 2022. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 2/1/22. (SJF) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Envision Physician Services of Arizona LLC, Patrick Nichols. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Ariel Cohen. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20276590. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-138-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ariel Cohen. (Finson, Lowell) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20276590 filed by Ariel Cohen. (Finson, Lowell) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.