Hahn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Vincent Eugene Hahn
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv00206
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Morrissey
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michonne Omo appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Omo, Michonne)
April 8, 2022 Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff shall show cause in writing on or before April 15, 2022, why he should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with Rule 3.7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plaintiff complies with Rule 3.7(b) on or before April 15, 2022, by either consenting to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or electing to have the case assigned to a District Judge, this Order to Show Cause will be automatically deemed satisfied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey on 4/7/22. (MAP)
February 14, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona. (WLP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the summons and complaint on Defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey on 2/14/2022. (WLP)
February 9, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Morrissey. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-206-PHX-MTM. Magistrate Election form attached. (JAM)
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Vincent Eugene Hahn. (Franco, Nicole) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM)
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Vincent Eugene Hahn. (Franco, Nicole) (JAM)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Vincent Eugene Hahn. (Franco, Nicole) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hahn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vincent Eugene Hahn
Represented By: Nicole Julie Franco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Michonne Louise Omo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?