Thomas v. Adel et al
| Jay Cameron Thomas |
| Allister Adel, Maricopa, County of, Arizona, State of and David Shinn |
| 2:2022cv00232 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed February 18, 2022, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion Requesting Time Waiver (Doc. #1 ) is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/17/22. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jay Cameron Thomas (2 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
