Muhammad v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
| Abdul Muhammad |
| Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona, State of and Maricopa, County of |
| 2:2022cv00239 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed February 17, 2022, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/16/22. (DXD)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Abdul Muhammad (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Abdul Muhammad (8 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
