Christensen v. Earnhardt Management Company
| Jordan Christensen |
| Earnhardt Management Company |
| 2:2022cv00246 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 5/19/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/15/2022. (RMV)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Earnhardt Management Company. (Zweig, Jay) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Earnhardt Management Company.(Zweig, Jay) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Jordan Christensen: Proof of Service re: SUMMONS are: CIVIL COVER SHEET; VERIFIED COMPLAINT; NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE-EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; ORDER RE: MOTIONS upon Earnhardt Management Company on 22.02.22. (Zoldan, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/16/2022. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Earnhardt Management Company. (BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20351346. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00246-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jordan Christensen. (Zoldan, Michael) (BAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20351346 filed by Jordan Christensen. (Zoldan, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Christensen v. Earnhardt Management Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jordan Christensen | |
| Represented By: | Michael David Zoldan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Earnhardt Management Company | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Marie Repka |
| Represented By: | Jay A Zweig |
| Represented By: | Melissa R Costello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
