SeeWriteHear LLC v. Thomas et al
Plaintiff: SeeWriteHear LLC
Defendant: Marc Thomas and Unknown Thomas
Case Number: 2:2022cv00293
Filed: February 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/24/22. (MJF)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). IT IS ORDERED no later than May 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for every defendant located in a judicial district of the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than May 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a statement setting forth how and when service on any foreign defendant will be accomplished. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/24/22. (MJF)
February 25, 2022 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SeeWriteHear LLC. (Camoriano, James)
February 24, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to SeeWriteHear LLC. (ARC)
February 24, 2022 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20380569. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-293-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
February 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20380569 filed by SeeWriteHear LLC. (Camoriano, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SeeWriteHear LLC v. Thomas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SeeWriteHear LLC
Represented By: James Daniel Camoriano
Represented By: James Edward Holland, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marc Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?