Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hoffman
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Arthur S Hoffman |
| 2:2022cv00296 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Daniel Oren Blau. (Blau, Daniel) |
Filing 10
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Vacate (Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. No later than June 3, 2022, Plaintiff shall file its motion regarding monetary remedies or, if the settlement is rejected, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating how they wish to proceed. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/5/2022. (LAD)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Vacate #8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blau, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Monetary Remedies. Plaintiff shall have through April 11, 2022, to file their motion setting forth the amount of monetary relief. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/3/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Monetary Remedies (UNOPPOSED) by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blau, Daniel) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED no later than March 11, 2022, Plaintiff shall file its motion setting forth the amount of monetary relief that should be included in the final judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/1/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arthur S Hoffman. (JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment (titled as Consent of Defendant Arthur S. Hoffman) by Securities and Exchange Commission. Roslyn O Silver (Attachments: #1 Proposed Judgment)(JAM) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-296-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Blau, Daniel) (JAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Blau, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hoffman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Amy J Longo |
| Represented By: | Daniel Oren Blau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arthur S Hoffman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
