Manny v. Intel Corporation
| Jeff Manny |
| Intel Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00330 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Stipulation of Dismissal : This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own costs and fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/29/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Jeff Manny. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Silence, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Stipulated Motion to Continue Case Management Conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Case Management Conference set on April 12, 2022, at 11:00 A.M. is VACATED AND RESET to May 12, 2022, at 11:00 A.M. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Joint Case Management Report shall be filed not later than May 5, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/30/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference re: #9 Order by Jeff Manny. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Silence, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 *NOTICE re: Service of #6 Preliminary Order by Jeff Manny . (Silence, Jeffrey) *Modified to add document linkage on 3/15/2022 (LAD). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED a Case Management Conference is set for April 12, 2022, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 604, Sandra Day OConnor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151. Counsel showing good cause may file a stipulation for telephonic appearance not less than five business days prior to this conference. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/10/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 8 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Intel Corporation. (Perez, Alejandro) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Intel Corporation.(Perez, Alejandro) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/3/22. (MJF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED no later than June 1, 2022, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for every defendant located in a judicial district of the United States.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than June 1, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a statement setting forth how and when service on any foreign defendant will be accomplished. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/3/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Intel Corporation. (Ryden, Monica) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Intel Corporation. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20404258. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00330-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-017555. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20404258 filed by Intel Corporation. (Perez, Alejandro) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(SCA) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration upon Maria Martinez authroized agent for Intel Corporation on 02/01/2022.(Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 02/04/2022) (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Manny v. Intel Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeff Manny | |
| Represented By: | Corrinne Rebecca Viola |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A Silence |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Intel Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Alejandro Perez |
| Represented By: | Monica Marie Ryden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
