Cool v. Agua Fria Union High School District No. 216
Christopher Thomas Cool and Christopher T Cool |
Agua Fria Union High School District No. 216 |
2:2022cv00334 |
March 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Morrissey |
John J Tuchi |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/24/2022. (JAMA) |
Filing 14 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/24/2022. (JAMA) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge John J Tuchi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-0034-PHX-JJT. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 12 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 10 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Agua Fria Union High School District No. 216.(Gardner, Bradley) |
Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey on 3/7/22. (SST) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX235796. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Morrissey. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV22-00334-PHX-MTM. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 consent)(BAS) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Christopher Thomas Cool. (BAS) |
Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Christopher Thomas Cool. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number PHX235796 filed by Christopher Thomas Cool.(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.