Overstreet v. Absolute Healthcare
| Cornele A Overstreet |
| Absolute Healthcare doing business as Curaleaf |
| 2:2022cv00361 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Labor: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Emily Carapella on behalf of Respondent Absolute Healthcare. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 14
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting in part Petitioner's Motion for Expedited Hearing and Pleading Schedule (Doc. #2 ) as follows: 1. Respondent's response brief to Petitioner's Motion (Doc. #2 ) shall not exceed twenty-nine pages and is due by May 13, 2022. 2. Petitioner's reply brief to Petitioner's Motion (Doc. #2 ) shall not exceed seventeen pages and is due by May 27, 2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED setting this matter for Oral Argument on June 14, 2022, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 602 Sandra Day OConnor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151. All witnesses shall appear in person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting in part Petitioner's Motion to Try Petition for Temporary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act on the Basis of the Administrative Record, Affidavits, and Other Documentary Evidence (Doc. #4 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Anissa Keane shall be deposed by Respondent no later than April 29, 2022. The deposition shall not exceed two hours in length and is limited to the precise topics enumerated in Respondent's Opposition. (Doc. #9 at 3:1217.) (See document for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/21/2022. (LAD)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held on 4/15/2022 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow: This is the time set for Motion Hearing. Discussion held. Deadlines set and hearing continued. Order to follow. APPEARANCES: Judith Davila for Petitioner. Robert Oller for Respondent. (Court Reporter Teri Veres.) Hearing held 2:29 PM to 2:39 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Ethan Daniel Balsam on behalf of Respondent Absolute Healthcare. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER - Before the Court are Petitioner's Motion for Expedited Hearing and Pleading Schedule, (Doc. #2 ), and Motion to Try Petition for Temporary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act on the Basis of the Administrative Record, Affidavits, and Other Documentary Evidence (Doc. #4 ). Respondent objects to both motions (Docs. #8 , #9 ). The Court finds it would be beneficial to schedule this matter for oral argument on the pending motions and to set deadlines for the underlying Petition. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this matter is set for Oral Argument for April 15, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 601, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/25/2022. (WLP)
|
| Filing 11 *NOTICE of Errata re: Certificate of Service, SERVICE EXECUTED : Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 3/24/2022 to Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf . by Petitioner Cornele A Overstreet. (Davila, Judith) *Modified to add service information to reflect Waiver of Service of Summons on 3/25/2022 (WLP). |
| Filing 10 *NOTICE re: Mailing #1 Complaint/Petition, #2 Motion for Expediting Hearing and Pleading Schedule, #3 Motion for Leave, #4 Motion Try Petition for Temporary Injunction, #6 Order upon Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf . (Davila, Judith) *Modified to correct event to reflect mailing, not service on 3/25/2022 (WLP). |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #4 MOTION to Try Petition for Temporary Injunction Under Section 10(J) of the National Labor Relations Act on The Basis of the Administrative Record filed by Absolute Healthcare. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Oller, Robert) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #2 MOTION to Expedite Hearing and Pleading Schedule filed by Absolute Healthcare. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Oller, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The Court's 3/11/2022 Order #6 ordered Petitioner shall serve Respondent with the Petition, all motions filed to date and a copy of the March 11, 2022 Order no later than Wednesday, March 16, 2022. IT IS ORDERED Petitioner file proof of service by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, March 21, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/18/2022. (KFZ)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Excess of Page Limitations #3 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve Respondent with the Petition, all motions filed to date, and a copy of this Order by no later than Wednesday, March 16, 2022. See attached Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/11/2022. (KFZ)
|
| Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00361-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
| Filing 4 Petitioner's MOTION to Try Petition for Temporary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act on the Basis of the Administrative Record, Affidavits, and Other Documentary Evidence by Cornele A Overstreet. (Anzaldua, Fernando) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BAC) |
| Filing 3 Petitioner's MOTION for Leave to File Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Excess of Page Limitations by Cornele A Overstreet. (Anzaldua, Fernando) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BAC) |
| Filing 2 Petitioner's MOTION for Expedited Hearing and Pleading Schedule by Cornele A Overstreet. (Anzaldua, Fernando) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT/Petition for Temporary Injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, as Amended [29 U.S.C. 160(j)] filed by Cornele A Overstreet. (Anzaldua, Fernando) (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Appendix of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-2, #4 Exhibit 3 part 1, #5 Exhibit 3 part 2, #6 Exhibit 3 part 3, #7 Exhibit 3 part 4, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibits 5-13, #10 Proposed Order Granting Temporary Injunction, #11 Proposed Order to Show Cause, #12 Certificate of Service, #13 Jurat, #14 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Overstreet v. Absolute Healthcare | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cornele A Overstreet | |
| Represented By: | Fernando Jose Anzaldua |
| Represented By: | Judith Elizabeth Davila |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Absolute Healthcare doing business as Curaleaf | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
