Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated
Pilot Incorporated |
NOCO Company Incorporated |
2:2022cv00389 |
March 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles |
Property Rights: Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Christensen Jones on behalf of NOCO Company Incorporated. (Jones, Jacob) |
Filing 12 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Meredith Wilkes on behalf of Defendant NOCO Company Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 11 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - that Plaintiff shall have until May 6, 2022, to show cause in writing why they should not be sanctioned or be held in contempt of court pursuant to title 18 U.S.C. 401 for failing to comply Rule 3.7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plaintiff complies with Rule 3.7(b) on or before May 6, 2022, by either consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction or electing to have the case assigned to a District Judge, the undersigned will automatically vacate this Order to Show Cause. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 4/22/2022. (WLP) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Alex W Ruge on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Out of state attorney Alex W Ruge terminated as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Pilot Incorporated: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 3/18/2022 to NOCO Company Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) *Modified party served on 3/22/2022 (DXD). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Pilot Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (Attachments: #1 AO 121)(MYE) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to NOCO Company Incorporated. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20441683. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-389-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Pilot Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) (MYE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pilot Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) (MYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20441683 filed by Pilot Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pilot Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Aaron P Bradford |
Represented By: | Alex W Ruge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NOCO Company Incorporated | |
Represented By: | David Gary Barker |
Represented By: | Meredith Wilkes |
Represented By: | Jacob Christensen Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.