Frenci v. Rush Auto Corporation LLC et al
| Christopher Frenci |
| Rush Auto Corporation LLC named as Rush Auto Corportation LLC doing business as Pick-A-Part doing business as We Buy Scrap doing business as Rush Auto Recyclers Incorporated, Janet Rush and Daniel Thorpe |
| 2:2022cv00414 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint in this case. (Doc. #11 .) But this filing does not follow Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.1. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall refile her amended complaint in compliance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.1.. Ordered by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 5/11/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO)
|
|
Filing 11
*First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Christopher Frenci. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Motion to Amend)(Frenci, Christopher) *Modified to reflect Local Rule violations; filer noticed on 5/12/2022 (SST).
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED granting the Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Respond to Complaint (Doc. #9 .) The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1) is extended to May 20, 2022. There will be no further extensions absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Ordered by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 4/25/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO)
|
|
Filing 9
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Janet Rush, Rush Auto Corporation LLC, Daniel Thorpe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gittler, Amy)
|
|
Filing 8
*SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christopher Frenci: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Rush Auto Corporation LLC, Janet Rush and Daniel Thorpe on 4/5/22. (Frenci, Christopher) *Modified to reflect correct event on 4/13/2022 (SST).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 4/5/2022. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Christopher Frenci. (LAD) (7 pages)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided to plaintiff at counter. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Submitted by Christopher Frenci. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX236177. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00414-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number PHX136177 filed by Christopher Frenci.(BAS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
