Bustamante v. Shinn et al
Petitioner: Ephrain Vega Bustamante
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2022cv00422
Filed: March 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles (PS)
Referring Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Ephrain Vega Bustamante: #228430, La Palma Correctional Center, 5501 N La Palma Rd, Eloy, AZ 85131 (2 pages). (DXD)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #4 ) is granted. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must send Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Non-Death Penalty)." (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/11/22. (SST)
April 12, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE re: Certificate by Ephrain Vega Bustamante re: #3 Order (2 pages). (DXD)
April 12, 2022 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ephrain Vega Bustamante (2 pages). (DXD)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must file a completed and signed Certificate, using the form provided with this Order. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/30/22. (DXD)
March 18, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
March 18, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Ephrain Vega Bustamante. (38 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bustamante v. Shinn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ephrain Vega Bustamante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?