Slucher v. I.Q. Data International Incorporated et al
| Savanna Slucher |
| I.Q. Data International Incorporated and Experian Information Solutions Incorporated |
| 2:2022cv00504 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by I.Q. Data International Incorporated.(Van Vranken, Ember) |
| Filing 14 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Savanna Slucher: Proof of Service re: Summons upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on 04/12/2022. (Adams, Michael) |
Filing 13
ORDER pursuant to #12 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint: IT IS ORDERED that Experian Information Solutions, Inc. shall have until and including June 2, 2022, to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/9/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Savanna Slucher. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Adams, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Notice of Extension wherein Plaintiff's counsel states he granted an extension to answer and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.s answer is due no later than June 2, 2022. Counsel is referred to Rule 6(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. and LRCiv 7.3. Counsel is not authorized to grant an extension of time. Only the Court may for good cause. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/4/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE re: Extension of Time for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to Answer by Savanna Slucher . (Adams, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER pursuant to #8 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to May 31, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/2/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by I.Q. Data International Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to extend deadline to respond)(Van Vranken, Ember) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by I.Q. Data International Incorporated. (Van Vranken, Ember) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ember Ann Van Vranken on behalf of I.Q. Data International Incorporated. (Van Vranken, Ember) |
| Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Savanna Slucher: Return of Service re: Summons upon I.Q. Data International, Inc. on 04/11/2022. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Incorporated, I.Q. Data International Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20499519. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-504-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Savanna Slucher. (Adams, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20499519 filed by Savanna Slucher. (Adams, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
