Hiller v. Arizona Board of Regents
Plaintiff: Meghan Draper Hiller
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Case Number: 2:2022cv00554
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Meghan Draper Hiller. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number PHX237405. PAID IN FULL. (BAS)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER When bringing an action, a plaintiff must either pay a filing fee of $350, plus an administrative fee of $52, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees. Any application to proceed in forma pauperis must include a statement of all assets a plaintiff possesses to show that the person is unable to pay such fees. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee for this action nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of this deficiency, the Court will give Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.If Plaintiff fails to submit the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (BAS)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00554-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 instructions)(BAS)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Meghan Draper Hiller. (BAS)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. filed by Meghan Draper Hiller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hiller v. Arizona Board of Regents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meghan Draper Hiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?