Johnson et al v. Secure Ventures LLC
June Johnson and Carl Johnson |
Secure Ventures LLC |
2:2022cv00568 |
April 7, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
James A Teilborg |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed May 12, 2022, judgment is hereby entered and this case is dismissed for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice. (SST) |
![]() |
Filing 26 SUPPLEMENT re: #16 Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (2 Pages) (REK) |
![]() |
Filing 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Supplement by Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (3 Pages) (REK) |
![]() |
Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT re: #18 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Carl Johnson. (SST) (6 pages) |
Filing 21 STRICKEN by #23 : SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiffs Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (SST) (19 pages) Modified on 4/21/2022 (RMW). |
![]() |
Filing 19 Revision of Documents Filed 4-7-2022 as Pro Se Litigants and Detailed Explanation of Errors within Documents and Their Corrections for Reconsideration Res Judicata filed by Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (SMH) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Reconsideration, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (SMH) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Reconsideration, MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (SMH) |
Filing 16 COMPLAINT (REVISED) against All Defendants filed by June Johnson, Carl Johnson. (SMH) |
Filing 15 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Carl Johnson. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
Filing 14 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by June Johnson. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION to Set Aside, MOTION Restrain Supplemental Judgment filed by Carl Johnson. (SMH) (8 pages) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Carl Johnson re: #1 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Carl Johnson. (SMH) (6 pages) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re: #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Carl Johnson. (SMH) (6 pages) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00568-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Carl Johnson and June Johnson. (BAS) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order with exhibits by Carl Johnson and June Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BAS) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carl Johnson, June Johnson. (BAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (TRO Requested) filed by June Johnson, Carl Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.