Scott, II v. Maricopa, County of et al
Gene Edward Scott, II |
Maricopa, County of, Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of and Arizona, State of |
2:2022cv00607 |
April 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration and Objection re: #8 Order Dismissing Case by Gene Edward Scott, II. (4 Pages) (REK) |
|
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. (SMH) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. (SMH) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00607-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gene Edward Scott, II. (5 Pages) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. (7 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.