Hasz et al v. Arizona, State of et al
Plaintiff: Mark Hasz and Shaun Holland
Defendant: Arizona, State of and James Kimble
Case Number: 2:2022cv00667
Filed: April 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Referring Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/15/22. (MJF)
June 13, 2022 Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Steven P Logan. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV22-00667-PHX-SPL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 10, 2022 Filing 17 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 10, 2022 Filing 16 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF RECUSAL - That this matter is reassigned to the Honorable Deborah M. Fine, United States District Judge. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-20-01317-PHX-DMF. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 6/9/22. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
June 10, 2022 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
June 8, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE re: Joint Notice of Attorney Conflict and Request to Reschedule Scheduling Conference by Arizona, State of, James Kimble . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Orcutt, Anne)
May 31, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: On the Court's own Motion, Scheduling Conference is re-set from 6/6/2022 at 11:30AM to 6/9/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T Liburdi. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO)
May 26, 2022 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Mark Hasz, Shaun Holland. (Bihn, Martin)
May 26, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: On the Court's own Motion Scheduling Conference is re-set IN TIME ONLY from 6/6/2022 at 1:30PM to 6/6/2022 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T Liburdi. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO)
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for Monday 6/6/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T Liburdi. The parties must file the Joint Proposed Case Management Report with the Clerk of the Court at least 10 days before the Scheduling Conference. See the attached order for additional information. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 5/2/2022.(AO)
April 29, 2022 Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Arizona, State of, James Kimble. (Orcutt, Anne)
April 29, 2022 Filing 6 Defendant Kimble's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Arizona, State of, James Kimble.(Orcutt, Anne)
April 22, 2022 Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Mark Hasz, Shaun Holland. (Bihn, Martin)
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 *Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Civil Cover Sheet by Defendants Arizona, State of, James Kimble. (Struck, Daniel) *Modified to correct linkage from Doc. 3 to Doc. 1 on 4/25/2022. (SMH)
April 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by James Kimble, Arizona, State of. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO)
April 22, 2022 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20587649. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-667-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
April 22, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-017661. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20587649 filed by James Kimble, Arizona, State of. (Struck, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(MCO)
April 22, 2022 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Return of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Lisa Fischer, Receptionist at Arizona, State of, c/o Arizona Attorney General on 2/2/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 2/8/2022). (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
April 22, 2022 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Arizona, State of. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES*** (MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hasz et al v. Arizona, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Hasz
Represented By: Donna Marie McDaniel
Represented By: Martin Andrew Bihn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaun Holland
Represented By: Donna Marie McDaniel
Represented By: Martin Andrew Bihn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Represented By: Anne Marie Orcutt
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Kimble
Represented By: Anne Marie Orcutt
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?