Strong #256997 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
Preston Alton Strong |
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Riharb, Unknown Lee and David Shinn |
2:2022cv00800 |
May 11, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
Douglas L Rayes |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's order filed June 10, 2022, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (REK) |
![]() |
Filing 7 *RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #6 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Preston Alton Strong. (2 Pages) (REK) *Modified to correct file date on 6/9/2022 (REK). |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (LAD) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Preston Alton Strong. (LAD) (1 page) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Preston Alton Strong. (LAD) (2 pages) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Preston Alton Strong. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LAD) (15 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.