Whetten v. Law Office of Brett M Borland PC
| Steven Whetten |
| Law Office of Brett M Borland PC |
| 2:2022cv00843 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Doc. #9 ) is granted. Defendant shall file its answer by August 10, 2022. Ordered by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 7/12/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Steven Whetten. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kent, Trinette) |
| Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Steven Whetten: Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Jury Demand, Civil Cover Sheet, Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge upon Law Office of Brett M Borland PC on 06/20/22. (Kent, Trinette) *Modified docket entry to correct what documents were served, served upon defendant, and correct service date from 6/15/22 to 6/20/22 on 6/24/2022. (SMH) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Michael T Liburdi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-00843-PHX-MTL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Law Office of Brett M Borland PC. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20668923. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00843-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Steven Whetten. (Kent, Trinette) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20668923 filed by Steven Whetten. (Kent, Trinette) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whetten v. Law Office of Brett M Borland PC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Whetten | |
| Represented By: | Trinette G Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Law Office of Brett M Borland PC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
