Mohammed v. Global Linguist Solution LLC
| Ahmed Mohammed |
| Global Linguist Solution LLC |
| 2:2022cv00909 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Adopting the (Doc. #10 ) Report and Recommendation of the MagistrateJudge. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this action without prejudice. (Doc.9). FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 7/15/22. (MAP)
|
|
Filing 10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the First Amended Complaint (Doc. #9 ) and this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment. The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. The parties shall have fourteen days within which to file responses to any objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the District Court without further review. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure to file timely objections to any factual determination of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 6/27/2022. (WLP)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Global Linguist Solution LLC filed by Ahmed Mohammed.(DXD) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not within twenty-one days of this Order file a First Amended Complaint that cures the Complaint's deficiencies, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge will issue a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff files a First Amended Complaint in this Court, the First Amended Complaint may not be served until the Court screens the First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure of Plaintiff to timely comply with Orders of this Court may result in the dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice by the District Judge pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (6), (h)(3), 41, Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii); and/or pursuant to the Court's inherent power. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992) (trial courts have inherent power to control their docket and, in exercise of that power, may impose sanctions including, where appropriate, dismissal of a case). (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 6/7/2022. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is granted. Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed in this matter without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of the Complaint by any means may not proceed until further Court order authorizing service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 6/06/2022. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M. Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00909-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 consent form)(BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ahmed Mohammed. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ahmed Mohammed.(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mohammed v. Global Linguist Solution LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ahmed Mohammed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Global Linguist Solution LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
