Lerma #80531 v. Shinn et al
| Alfredo Lerma |
| David Shinn, Charles Ryan, Unknown Shivers and Unknown Hernandez |
| 2:2022cv00919 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's order filed June 3, 2022, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (REK) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is denied. Plaintiff's Complaint #1 and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he must prepay the entire $402.00 filing and administrative fees when he files his action. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/03/2022. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (DXD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alfredo Lerma (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Alfredo Lerma (17 pages). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
