Peterson v. Quiktrip #1406 et al
Jasmin R Peterson |
Quiktrip #1406 an Oklahoma corporation doing business as Quiktrip, Quiktrip Corporation, Unknown Party and Unknown Parties |
2:2022cv00938 |
May 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan R Bolton |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/10/2023. Dispositive motions due by 8/11/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/2/2024. Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2024 at 10:30 AM before Senior Judge Susan R Bolton. Jury Trial set for 1/22/2024 at 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Susan R Bolton [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/28/22. (MAW) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Senior Judge Susan R Bolton: Scheduling Conference held on 7/28/2022. IT IS ORDERED directing Plaintiff's counsel to submit to chamber's mailbox no later than 5:00 p.m., 8/1/2022, a proposed Order dismissing fictitious defendants. Deadlines discussed and entered. Rule 16 Scheduling Order to issue. Counsel are directed to the court's website for this Court's Pretrial Order form. APPEARANCES: Amanda Boardman (appearing via Zoom) for Plaintiff. Karen Stafford (appearing via Zoom) for Defendant. (Court Reporter Candy Potter) Hearing held 10:47 AM to 11:02 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set on July 28, 2022, at 10:45 a.m. will be conducted in person and/or via Zoom. This Court's staff will provide counsel with the Zoom link for said hearing. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/28/22. (MAW) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Boardman on behalf of Jasmin R Peterson. (Boardman, Amanda) |
Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Jasmin R Peterson. (Boardman, Amanda) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for July 28, 2022 at 10:45 a.m. in Courtroom 502, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 6/9/22. (MAW) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Quiktrip Corporation.(Stafford, Karen) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20717353. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-938-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Quiktrip Corporation. (Stafford, Karen) (MYE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-091792. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20717353 filed by Quiktrip Corporation. (Stafford, Karen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-G, #4 Attachment Notice to Plaintiff)(MYE) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Civil Cover Sheet upon Quiktrip Corporation and Quiktrip #1406 on 5/3/2022. (Originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/4/2022.) (MYE) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.