Brandemuehl et al v. Mooney International Corporation et al
| Jenny Angela Brandemuehl, Wesley Augustus Brandemuehl, Adrian David Brandemuehl and Endurance American Insurance Company |
| Mooney International Corporation, Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated, Continental Motors Incorporated, C&M Aviation LLC an Idaho limited liability company doing business as Delta Aviation Incorporated, Morningstar Aviation Incorporated a Colorado corporation doing business as Delta Aviation Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2022cv00992 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Steven P Logan |
| Personal Injury: Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Remand re: #8 Order by Maricopa County Superior Court. (DXD) |
Filing 8
ORDER that the parties' stipulation to remand (Doc. #6 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall remand this action to the Maricopa County Superior Court and terminate this case. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter)(WLP)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Steven P Logan recused. Case reassigned to Judge Dominic W Lanza for all further proceedings. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-22-00992-PHX-DWL. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/1/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 6 *STIPULATION to Remand by Defendant Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated. (Fischer, C) *Modified to correct event on 7/5/2022 (WLP). |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Shalem Massey, Jennifer R Steeve on behalf of Defendant Mooney International Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Will S Skinner, Erik Slechta on behalf of Defendant Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. See attached PDF for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/8/22. (MJF)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to C&M Aviation LLC, Continental Motors Incorporated, Mooney International Corporation. (MYE) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20745772. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-992-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated. (Fischer, C) (MYE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-009395. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20745772 filed by Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated. (Fischer, C) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court File - Part 1, #4 Exhibit State Court File - Part 2, #5 Exhibit State Court File - Part 3, #6 Exhibit State Court File - Part 4, #7 Attachment Verification)(MYE) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Continental Motors, Inc. and Mooney International Corporation on 8/20/2021. (Originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 8/30/2021.) Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Morningstar Aviation, Inc. on 8/23/2021. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 8/31/2021.) Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon C&M Aviation LLC on 8/26/2021. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/1/2021.) Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc. on 8/24/2021. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/1/2021.) (MYE) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint by C&M Aviation LLC. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 3/30/2022). ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand by Continental Aerospace Technologies Incorporated. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/16/2022.) ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand by Mooney International Corporation. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 5/16/2022.) ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.***(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
