Sheffield #185251 v. Trinity Incorporated et al
| James Charles Sheffield |
| Trinity Incorporated, Unknown Florez, David Shinn, Unknown Parties and Centurion Health Care |
| 2:2022cv01092 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion Request for a Time Stamped Dated Copy of Attached Complaint to be Returned/Filed. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/13/22. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (DXD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Stamped Copy of Complaint by James Charles Sheffield (3 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by James Charles Sheffield (21 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
