Jobes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Brianna Jobes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv01160
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Filing 13 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
August 15, 2022 Filing 12 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
August 15, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David Priddy appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Priddy, David)
July 19, 2022 Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
July 18, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (REK)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 7/18/2022. (REK)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. See document for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 7/18/2022. (REK)
July 12, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01160-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAC)
July 12, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Brianna Jobes. (Dicus, Kathryn) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAC)
July 12, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brianna Jobes. (Dicus, Kathryn) (BAC)
July 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Brianna Jobes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jobes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brianna Jobes
Represented By: Kathryn Dicus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: David Priddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?