Medina et al v. PracticeMax Incorporated
Plaintiff: Flor Medina and Doreen Barbieri
Defendant: PracticeMax Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2022cv01261
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' #11 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Defendant PracticeMax, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint. The deadline for Defendant PracticeMax Incorporated to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint is extended to and including 9/29/2022. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/23/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
September 22, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION to Extend Time for PracticeMax to Respond re: #9 Amended Complaint by PracticeMax Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Honecker, Kathryn) Modified text on 9/23/2022 (WLP).
September 8, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Doreen Barbieri, Flor Medina . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notice of Filing an Amended Class Action Complaint (Complaint Redline))(Ryan, Elaine)
September 8, 2022 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against PracticeMax Incorporated filed by Flor Medina, Doreen Barbieri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Amended Class Action Complaint (Breach Notice))(Ryan, Elaine)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' #7 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Defendant PracticeMax, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint. The deadline for Defendant PracticeMax Incorporated to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' class action complaint is extended to and including 9/19/2022. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/19/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
August 19, 2022 Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint , MOTION for Extension of Time Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint by PracticeMax Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Honecker, Kathryn)
August 1, 2022 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Doreen Barbieri, Flor Medina: Declaration of Service re: Summons in a Civil Action; Class Action Complaint; Exhibit A; Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction; Order (Doc. 5) upon PracticeMax, Inc. on July 28, 2022. (Ryan, Elaine)
July 28, 2022 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Raina C Borrelli on behalf of Plaintiffs Doreen Barbieri, Flor Medina. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/27/2022. (RMV)
July 27, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PracticeMax Incorporated. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
July 27, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20922872. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1261-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
July 27, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Doreen Barbieri, Flor Medina. (Auer, Colleen) (MCO)
July 27, 2022 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20922872 filed by Flor Medina, Doreen Barbieri. (Auer, Colleen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina et al v. PracticeMax Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Flor Medina
Represented By: Colleen M Auer
Represented By: Elaine Ryan
Represented By: Raina C Borrelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doreen Barbieri
Represented By: Colleen M Auer
Represented By: Elaine Ryan
Represented By: Raina C Borrelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PracticeMax Incorporated
Represented By: Kathryn Ann Honecker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?