Tanner v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company et al
| Diane Tanner |
| Employers Mutual Casualty Company a business entity doing business as EMC Insurance, Root Insurance Company and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2022cv01280 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Employers Mutual Casualty Company. (McCarthy, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Employers Mutual Casualty Company. (McCarthy, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by Employers Mutual Casualty Company.(McCarthy, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Root Insurance Company. (Kokal, Jessica) |
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 8/10/2022. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE re: Consent By EMC Insurance To Removal by Root Insurance Company re: #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Order,, Set Deadlines, . (Kokal, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Root Insurance Company.(Kokal, Jessica) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company's joinder or consent to the removal of this action by August 8, 2022. Failure to timely file such joinder or consent will result in remand of this action to state court. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 8/2/2022. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Employers Mutual Casualty Company, Root Insurance Company. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20935061. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01280-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-004839. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20935061 filed by Root Insurance Company.(Kokal, Jessica) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(SCA) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service upon CT Corporation System, for ROOT Insurance Company on 07/14/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 07/11/2022) (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
