John v. Morales Auto Group LLC et al
| Jeremiah John |
| Morales Auto Group LLC, Christian Morales, Unknown Morales and Ricardo Morales |
| 2:2022cv01412 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Morales Auto Group LLC. (Hundley, Richard) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will issue a scheduling order after receiving the parties' Rule 26(f) report. After reviewing the Rule 26(f) report, the Court will set a case management conference if meeting with the parties appears necessary or helpful. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than October 26, 2022 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 9/28/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Morales Auto Group LLC. (MAW) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Christian Morales, Ricardo Morales, Morales Auto Group LLC.(Hundley, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED:1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on November 22, 2022, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/24/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ricardo Morales. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Jeremiah John. (Bendau, Clifford) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Christian Morales, Unknown Morales(named as Jane Doe Morales II), Unknown Morales(named as Jane Doe Morales), Morales Auto Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21012802. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1412-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jeremiah John. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21012802 filed by Jeremiah John. (Bendau, Clifford) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
